| 
		
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
			| Author | Message |  
			| themicker99 | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS vs SW and there Subs  Posted:  Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:53 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:58 pm
 Posts: 624
 Gender: male
 | 
				
					| lol i like to post the wars so those who are new can be up to date on what is going on in earth 3 and who is at war with who and so they know where its safer at/not as many wars at lol   .
 
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| Ilona | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS vs SW and there Subs  Posted:  Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:14 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:02 pm
 Posts: 1770
 Gender: female
 | 
				
					| I really appreciate the idea ! Lately, there were less and less alliances which posted BR's and stuff here. It hasn't to be a big 'world war' to be interesting! Everything around the world you play, enjoy and put your effort in is  Important.
 Keep on going
   
 
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| littleconqueror | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS vs SW and there Subs  Posted:  Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:03 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:10 pm
 Posts: 2761
 Location: USA
 Gender: male
 | 
				
					| L33t wrote: littleconqueror wrote: smh and this has hype how? Mind not being a *CENSORED* for once and let people post about their experiences on BD...sorry but a rank 44 alliance your warring with? do they even have armies?  _________________
 MGH 1st
 MGH 1st
 WWs 1st
 XIRX 4th
 TTE 1st
 RFW 2nd
 Hero 2nd
 
  3rd E5 SOLO
 FPM 1st
 TFF 2nd
 ToXc 1st
 add me on supermechs 8069321
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| UFNRLoon | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS vs SW and there Subs  Posted:  Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:57 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 4:15 pm
 Posts: 168
 | 
				
					| L33t wrote: littleconqueror wrote: smh and this has hype how? Mind not being a *CENSORED* for once and let people post about their experiences on BD...fully agree CORE is in second, if llona would just give us the resources we need we could get ahead of PNES in power and go grab crystals and relics from other alliances, untill were ahead of PNES but PNES would be too scared to fight us because we would be stronger then them and have help  _________________
 Most power - 176
 Most Crystals - 43
 Most Relics - 1
 Highest Rank - 5
 Alliances - UF, HQ, RAWR, APOC, CORE, LIL
 (red=leader)
 retired
 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| Diazepam | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS vs SW and there Subs  Posted:  Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:00 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:55 am
 Posts: 1163
 | 
				
					| UFNRLoon wrote: L33t wrote: littleconqueror wrote: smh and this has hype how? Mind not being a *CENSORED* for once and let people post about their experiences on BD...fully agree CORE is in second, if llona would just give us the resources we need we could get ahead of PNES in power and go grab crystals and relics from other alliances, untill were ahead of PNES but PNES would be too scared to fight us because we would be stronger then them and have help  We aren't rank 1 because we are scared of fighting. Lol.
 
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| themicker99 | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS vs SW and there Subs  Posted:  Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:27 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:58 pm
 Posts: 624
 Gender: male
 | 
				
					| ok thats why i posted this topic because its a war none the less lol and AS has lost 2 or 3 army's to SW thats why SW lost rank they where better ranked than NAF was when the war started.. so yea. and BRAS has joined the battle agianst SW as well.. SW is almost ranked 70 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| moustafam89 | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS vs SW and there Subs  Posted:  Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:57 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 10:20 am
 Posts: 46
 | 
				
					| Diazepam wrote: We aren't rank 1 because we are scared of fighting. Lol. ur rank 1 b/c every single alliance in this world bowed to you without a fight.  Also rank 1 b/c every alliance in this world was stupid enough to fight each other rather than fight PNES or seek peace with PNES and let their allies die.  The IQ of several alliances this era has been disappointing. Its reassuring that Loon is a good and experienced leader who has fought AP with great success even though there was a 14 rank gap.  I wouldn't underestimate The Core's capability if I were you John.
 
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| themicker99 | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS, BRAS vs SW and there Subs  Posted:  Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:06 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:58 pm
 Posts: 624
 Gender: male
 | 
				
					| looks like SW is about dead even though they changed the tag to LotD 
 
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| themicker99 | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS, BRAS vs SW (LotD) and there Subs  Posted:  Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:27 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:58 pm
 Posts: 624
 Gender: male
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	
			| themicker99 | 
				
									|  Post subject: Re: NAF, AS, BRAS vs SW (LotD) and there Subs  Posted:  Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:28 pm  |  |  
			| Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:58 pm
 Posts: 624
 Gender: male
 |  |  
			| Top |   |  
	|  | You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 You cannot edit your posts in this forum
 You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 
 |   
 |