i still laugh every time i see the TDF tag :G

This map is highly innacurate.

First of all UAC is not a alliance and UE shouldnt be included into UAC as a single piece of Land.

UE controls territories in N America and Europe and, im pretty sure most of Antarctica belongs to UE, as we have scattered colonies and bases.

You also skipped alot of smaller alliances that still have land, and I would argue UE does not have control of Indonesia or Bangladesh. NWA for example you skipped. MM is large enough to have its own boundries and it controls alot of USA zone.

BDA also controls territory in Asia, and Asia does not belong to UE or UAC, there many many unconquered alliances in Central Asia.

-TheProtector

protector i already covered this. also i made a map for asia showing all the true powers there. including BDA LWO and such

I Saw that,

But my emphasis is that most UE territories are overseas. On every continent.

But yea, I dont know why I care so much. haha.
And in my view your Asia map is kind of biased I would argue most Asian territories are held by no on and it is neutral.


I just wanted everyone to know that UE is not pushed around by UAC and UE is a indevidual Alliance, and just a member of this coalition, and you should not mistaken us for being under this coalition or anything.

-TheProtector

i try to be subtle about it but its mostly edwin who pushes the subject of the UAC, the only time i really use it is when i dont feel like saying all four alliances names, or if we voted on something. and the reason why my asian map is biased is because i count it as who has the most power in the area in terms of outposts and conquers. maybe not everyone is conquered in asia but KoR and UE have outposts near most of them ready to take em out. like TAK. KoR has few men there but we already conquered some of their members and BH we have ops there and my members have started their assault.

Gives Redoroin a kitten to keep him warm in Antarctica.

Thats funny Knight!

Because it is you who has been trying to persuade me to bring The Fighting 69th into your coalition.

I thought that it was strange that the coalition was lead by one of the lesser members, who spoke of grand plans and dominance.

The Protectors replys to your overstated claims have confirmed my opinions of the UAC. Maybe you should confirm facts with The Protector before you start threatening people with your massive armies.

. -

On a side note to this.

I don't mean this as a criticism of UE as I have found the Protector 'as good as his word' and reasonable as well.

But if UE has a NAP with CRAP then your attempts to ferment a war seem fruitless as it is doubtful that UE would break its word in this matter unless directly attacked.

It would seem however that Edwin the one time leader and relic snatcher from USMC is once again heading in directions that few people would call honourable. Edwin has no business either negotiating on behalf of UE or announcing his intentions of breaking a NAP. I would imagine that The Protector will be oiling his whip in anticipation of putting the 'big mouths' back in their box!!

I for one will be glad of the quiet it will bring !!

The Maniac,

I thankyou for you message, I take it as a compliment

Yes, I have warned Edwin about his messages.

UE does not currently have a NAP with CRAP.

-TheProtector

Sorry Protector!

The way the situation was described in the forum by Knight and Kenny implied that there was a NAP or some other agreement in effect.

And my comments were intended as a compliment, it can't be easy keeping such a disparate group of people 'toeing the party line' !!

My guys and gals all know each other and even they sometimes disagree! However a visit to Moes Tavern for a few pints of Guinness and some donughts usually cures all ailments!

Thanks

Mo.

u just better make sure the beer tap doesnt run dry, or we might turn on each other. Specially Kane, hes great at being fodder