Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

edwin737 · **Posted:** Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:25 am

tahts still a lil

Plotter · **Posted:** Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:31 am

BUT UE get pwnt by 1500 troops

edwin737 · **Posted:** Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:38 am

yea we did lol

Hero · **Posted:** Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:57 am

DANGIT!!
To bad i couldnt kill more UE units(was on vacation)
oh well

Southern_Smoke · **Posted:** Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:48 pm

i like crap alliance. i know a few of their mevbers i have played all well rounds with. i hope u all hang in there.

redwurm · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:36 am

Melfice is allright in my book.

zxc731 · **Joined:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:53 am **Posts:** 29

Hi guys,

I have no doubt, Melfice, that CRAP would have fought on and caused extensive damage to our army, why do you think we chose a ceasefire, because we know all too well that CRAP is a organized and excellent alliance. Besides it was Rock not I who chose war, I was always opposed to war as we didnt have much to gain, if your remembered correctly.

It was partially us not willing to consume more units, but more importantly it was us not willing to use up more oil and energy to get thousands of units from Asia (Before F69s good idea of using a relic ofcourse), Most of our members couldnt get their units to Antarctica, so we built most of the army from scratch, it wasnt until the end of the war before we were able to capture a midway island for transport, its poor planning I agree. At first I had expected our local Antarctic and S American garrison to be able to hold them off if a war had happened, but I guess i was wrong to underestimate you.

Good Day,

-TheProtector

Hero · **Posted:** Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:08 pm

zxc731 wrote:

Hi guys,

I have no doubt, Melfice, that CRAP would have fought on and caused extensive damage to our army, why do you think we chose a ceasefire, because we know all too well that CRAP is a organized and excellent alliance. Besides it was Rock not I who chose war, I was always opposed to war as we didnt have much to gain, if your remembered correctly.

It was partially us not willing to consume more units, but more importantly it was us not willing to use up more oil and energy to get thousands of units from Asia (Before F69s good idea of using a relic ofcourse), Most of our members couldnt get their units to Antarctica, so we built most of the army from scratch, it wasnt until the end of the war before we were able to capture a midway island for transport, its poor planning I agree. At first I had expected our local Antarctic and S American garrison to be able to hold them off if a war had happened, but I guess i was wrong to underestimate you.

Good Day,

-TheProtector

I actually like this guy. Atleast he admits he underestimated us.

maanco5 · **Posted:** Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:36 pm

zxc731 wrote:

Hi guys,

I have no doubt, Melfice, that CRAP would have fought on and caused extensive damage to our army, why do you think we chose a ceasefire, because we know all too well that CRAP is a organized and excellent alliance. Besides it was Rock not I who chose war, I was always opposed to war as we didnt have much to gain, if your remembered correctly.

It was partially us not willing to consume more units, but more importantly it was us not willing to use up more oil and energy to get thousands of units from Asia (Before F69s good idea of using a relic ofcourse), Most of our members couldnt get their units to Antarctica, so we built most of the army from scratch, it wasnt until the end of the war before we were able to capture a midway island for transport, its poor planning I agree. At first I had expected our local Antarctic and S American garrison to be able to hold them off if a war had happened, but I guess i was wrong to underestimate you.

Good Day,

-TheProtector

i always told u we should use relics for war
but i was always to risking

UE and CRAP