Kane, you sent 18 squads to that gate, so I specifically sent exactly 18 squads to match you for an even fight... Why did you turn...? I wanted a little battle? No trapping no over powering.. just a straight up brawl...!

Oh I get it, you wanted to be dumb, and you wanted me to join you. My apologies for not complying.

This is a strategy game, try some strategy. Saying it's bad sportsmanship to fight when it is to your advantage is like saying I should whine that you sent beam to fight my vehicles. It's just silly.

Remy you know kane doesnt have the Nads to come on even ground for a small brawl and you know he wont fight a fight were theres even a .05% chance he will lose so quit asking the non risk taking only here for a crushing win and no fun guy to come on even ground against you its not going to work.

Victorious warriors win first and then go to war,
Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
~ Sun Tzu

This is why you guys are losing and we are not, don't be silly. If you really wanted an even war of numbers you wouldn't have gathered all your allies, stop being hypocrites. If we fought you squad for squad we would take more losses, and since we are fighting a more numerous enemy we wouldn't have enough units to beat everyone. If we fight to our advantage, you know... like a smart player, we will lose less and that's the only way we took on rank 2-5 at once.

You embarrass yourself.

id have to agree with kevin on this one

squad for squad is bad strategy . why take more losses when not needed.

Agreed.


If you're here for "Even fair fights" with equally sized battle, I suggest that you go and play "Hello Kitty" or something.

This is Battle Dawn, Sun Tzu rules here



"Don't throw the arrow which will return against you"