Lets get this done early and right this time.
If you are an alliance located in North America, this is for you, if not, just go away.

If you choose to accept the following terms, you would be apart of a team for freedom, mostly.

Rules: In NACA, you must set aside all differences with local NA alliances, all wars must cease and you must come to peace.

NACA members are to help each other in times of need if it is a direct threat to their colonies. Example: SK gets invaded and we cant repel do to armies being away, RK or H would come to help if possible.
This creates unity and protection.

NACA members are to defend North America and its inhabitants to the end if a great threat invades. Example: A top alliance, SA alliances, RIP, etc.

NACA leaders may choose to pursue the target to their hive and finish them, or stay back and defend.

NACA members do not have to help other members with their conquests unless they want. It is recommended that if the alliance requests help, NACA members support them. Again, not mandatory, but recommended.
Example: SK invades Europe, NACA doesnt have to help. If SK experiences rough opposition and asks for help, its optional, but recommended.

NACA Leaders can propose "Pre-Emptive wars, this allows NACA to prepare for a war and invade an area. It could be to prevent an NA invasion or just to invade somewhere. Reason is needed and in some cases a majority vote depending on the vote. Example: SK proposes to invaded RIP, America proposes to the other leaders a reason, they negotiate about it, set up and plan the attack.

The above can be prevented if the other leaders disagree with a reason to invade. If thats the case, the alliance that pushed for the attack can still attack, just with limited to no support from NACA.

NACA members are still independent alliances. All this treaty does is strengthen the alliances bond.

NACA leaders decide how NACA runs and works. The leaders are the leaders of the NACA member alliance's. They act as a council.
If you have skype, this makes it perfect.
-----------------------------------------------

And that is NACA, a treaty with potential, needs loyalty and coordination.
Message me if you are interested, having a skype would be nice, but the world isnt perfect. Any questions or you are interested to join, post them or message me. Thanks.

--America, SK Leader

good for all NA alliances i hope this era stay in peace with NA and SA people.

hmm that sounds good, I have a thing just like that, called brother aliances, what if you are friendly with one of the 'NACA' aliances but not another should it be changed so that you are friendly with them all?

and what are the aliances currently in this NACA?

Its so you are allied with all alliances in NA. Difference from being Bro alliances, is that you dont have to help them if they need help in Asia for example. A brother alliance would most likely send support, as for a NACA member, its optional.

I've seen stuff like this bit in my experience, they just crash and burn as someone will backstab sooner or later.

See, thats where NACA is different, we have 3 alliances with power to enforce it, if a civil war broke out, we destroy them and ship em off to some far away land.

most likely, I wouldnt bother with this, since giving help is optional you havent done much more than make NA mark eachother blue

It is ment for giant problems. If RIP invaded, not one alliance could defend alone, we would need all of them. If all of the NACA council wanted to war a top 5 alliance, not one could do it alone unless they too were top 5. It is mainly unity, they will listen to it because they dont like people invading.

It was better last era, not many alliances here this era. In NA that is.