everything includes BAZINGA and everything > SM so BAZINGA > SM therefore BAZINGA > everything in SM so BAZINGA > starwa7s

Thank you llona!


By the way, you made some logical jumps here. Socialmisfit1, logically I agree with you that Everything > SM (because SM is only a small parameter that exists within Everything). Then you say Everything includes Bazinga. Now I know there is probably some inside thing going on here (I pray it is not referencing Big Bang Theory), but I do assume that you are correct in that Bazinga is included within Everything. However, things in SM may have properties that exist elsewhere within the "Everything" that you speak of. So the value in correspondence with Bazinga and SM are all relative (vague). Everything is greater than every non-Everything, so Everything > Bazinga, just as Everything > SM, but because SM includes parts properties of Everything, just as Bazing includes properties of Everything.

Lastly, Starwa7s is not necessarily an entity that exists solely within SM, therefore Starwa7s may have properties that exist outside of SM (or Bazinga for that matter), as well as share some of the properties of SM (possibly as well as with Bazinga, but as I do not necessarily know Bazinga's true meaning, I will not assume anything), therefore it is likely that Starwa7s has collectively accumulated enough properties over a lifetime to exceed the collective of Bazinga and SM, although it is technically possible for Starwa7s to be beneath both. Either way, value of Starwa7s compared to Bazinga is semantically ambiguous, because Starwa7s's value can be above or below the value associated with Bazinga.