Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

cpzeuz · **Joined:** Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm **Posts:** 2

y not 5 members u can hav 4 friends and itll b bigger wars instead of stupid 2 man wars meaning if 1 guy dies they team up on that 1 guy and easy loss or win so 5 would b gd

routhy12 · **Posted:** Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:32 pm

actually now i think of it 5 is quite good but i still want 2 man and as for the 22 man alliances that is redicules it would be too easy and boring.

Vospader21 · **Joined:** Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:09 am **Posts:** 39

I'd go with 3, I like the whole triad alliance thing.

routhy12 · **Posted:** Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:39 pm

fair enough but i would rather 6 than 3 small alliances but fun and less inactive members

Solsane · **Joined:** Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:04 pm **Posts:** 3

I say two, I think it would be cool to have doubles.

routhy12 · **Posted:** Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:04 pm

Solsane wrote:

I say two, I think it would be cool to have doubles.

i agree doubles would take loads of skill.

frankwell · **Joined:** Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:08 am **Posts:** 1

IT might actully be cool as 1000 vs 10000

mancini6295 · **Joined:** Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:37 pm **Posts:** 1

I ALSO VOTE FOR 2 PEOPLE INSTEAD OF 3 LONGER ROUNDS AND TOUGHF

tyrese · **Posted:** Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:00 am

i think it should be 2 people because if your good your score would be better. :evil:

Jack · **Posted:** Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:27 am

Three people, easier to manage time and resources, while still maintaining a unique challenge.

Fantasy 5 Community Poll!