Author |
Message |
willow
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:36 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:08 pm Posts: 153
|
Necromancer wrote: when i first started playing the new client all i had at the time was a laptop with 256mb ram.. it just died completely lol. A little off topic, how long does it take to replace that many units after a battle this big? My alliance is ranked 29 right now, so we're all basically playing on a completely different level. I'm curious how you more highly ranked player alliances operate. Over 500 soldiers lost on both sides is a lot...
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:28 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 687 Gender: male
|
Well looking at purely Kanes power level after his units were killed, it would seem he has many farms. Farms=tax=metal to rebuild. So for it shouldn't take him to rebuild..also have to consider that his upkeep was lowered because of the loss so units will be cheaper for him.
For UTM, where many of their members lost units, their upkeep will stay around the same so to rebuilding will be much slower.
_________________ Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND) FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR 8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
Top |
|
Necromancer
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:21 am |
|
Specialist |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:04 am Posts: 35 Gender: male
|
gaurav1 wrote: Well looking at purely Kanes power level after his units were killed, it would seem he has many farms. Farms=tax=metal to rebuild. So for it shouldn't take him to rebuild..also have to consider that his upkeep was lowered because of the loss so units will be cheaper for him.
For UTM, where many of their members lost units, their upkeep will stay around the same so to rebuilding will be much slower. That does not change the fact that F69 have lost many units to nukes and have been very poorly organised. We have just been chasing the rest around, because they dont appear to be doing much.
_________________ E1 - Annatar of Mirkwood - Leader of WD
|
|
Top |
|
willow
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:34 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:08 pm Posts: 153
|
What was Psg188's power like before hand? and how does it compare to what it's at now?
Necromancer, It's probably a very complicated and very cunning plan to make you THINK they are unorganized and confused, but the moment you fall for it and press the attack, they will spring the trap and play perfectly.
In fact, Psg188 was probably told by the frogs and toads down under, that his current unit strategy was not working so he consulted with the Lords of the Ivory Tower, devised a new and improved strategy from his trial and error this round and desiring to try it outer cleared it with F69's strategists and staged that doomed attack to make you THINK you were actually doing well, when all along you were simply playing to his tune!!!!
It has to be something like that, obviously. Fascinating, really. You have to watch out for these things o_O
That's what Willow thinks anyways....
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:04 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 687 Gender: male
|
I have the great honor of presenting the latest battle on the UTM front. This is how you fight a battle without having to abuse the game. 37 UTM squads went from being the hunter to becoming prey Sorry to say 15 UTM squads escaped the trap.
_________________ Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND) FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR 8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
Top |
|
willow
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:17 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:08 pm Posts: 153
|
Wow, this is intense!
That's some crazy combat going on. Is this considered the deciding blow in the war or merely a single battle amidst many challenges?
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
redwurm
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:58 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 799 Location: Ohio Gender: male
|
I'd go with the latter.
_________________ mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote: There is no clue boost. bfan8475 wrote: If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight
|
|
Top |
|
Xeder
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:34 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:12 pm Posts: 21 Gender: male
|
I'm to lazy now to add proper BR but today UTM made "very organized" attack ..on our gate Attackers : Army worth : 34200 metal, 13200 oil and 210 soldiers. Attackers lost all units. Defenders : Loses : 5100 metal, 0 oil and 51 soldiers.
_________________ NC: E4:A3 MupT Gonzo of ChickenLove E1:A2 XI Iceman of Drake's Castle RC Fantasy VV THHG of Antioch E1:A1 F69 Galzin of Daisho OC: NOM,ARM,SIMP
|
|
Top |
|
redwurm
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:51 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 799 Location: Ohio Gender: male
|
Whoa, wouldn't mind seeing that BR. Some crap ratios?
_________________ mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote: There is no clue boost. bfan8475 wrote: If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight
|
|
Top |
|
Mafia
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:23 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:01 pm Posts: 12 Gender: male
|
stop saying that they abused the game. it not your call, that is down to the rules.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|