Author |
Message |
andrew852456
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:26 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:52 am Posts: 7
|
lost101 wrote: LoL Prince Ash where were your units in tht BR man only 98? You styll have a few members with power including yourself so why giving up already? Neway it was defiantly a nyce BR and you guys put up a hell of a fight I wonder will Dsny be Brave enough to keep all your Relics? or will they give them up to TLA? ( I think they'll give them up since they're really a TLA sub ) Remeber this for next time Bro: "When things are good everyone wants to be your friend but when the chips are down is when you find out who your "real" friends are" IS THE 2nd PARAGRAPH TRUE LOST?
|
|
Top |
|
littleconqueror
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:27 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:10 pm Posts: 2761 Location: USA Gender: male
|
HashBrowns wrote: Ah, a sad thing to log back into. I was hoping more players would log on and join their forces to ours, but that didn't happen. At least, however, the ones who were still online did not abandon the rest of us to die alone. Oh, here is that BR I promised someone. I...hope I did that correctly. And TLA, as for all these conspiracy theories, well, I hate playing the game afraid that everyone is playing me off against everyone else. So I am going to go ahead and ignore them, as it makes no difference at this point anyway. Good era, I had fun. Thanks Warlord for your sacrifices, who is quitting BD. And thanks to the rest of my team as well. Good game, guys. I look forward to another exciting era, although I don't know who I'll be with next time. And @lost You are somewhat correct, eh? GToH has an excuse, as they were off fighting GOO. DSNY apparently has an era-long nap with TLA. As for the subs, we couldn't rouse a single one, Ah well. such ugly armies
_________________ MGH 1st MGH 1st WWs 1st XIRX 4th TTE 1st RFW 2nd Hero 2nd
3rd E5 SOLO FPM 1st TFF 2nd ToXc 1st add me on supermechs 8069321
|
|
Top |
|
lost101
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:05 am |
|
Specialist |
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:05 pm Posts: 24
|
@ andrew852456 Were about to find out aren't we? someone's gonna be taking Tar's Relics if it's TLA we know DSny's either scared of TLA or SCared of TLA Cuz Really who's gonna turn down a gift of free Relics?
|
|
Top |
|
CodeoftheSith
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:15 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:06 pm Posts: 670
|
@Lost Seriously? who r u? @Andrew: Just warning you now, double posting is against forum rules, so just go back and edit your previous posts when you want to change something.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
lost101
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:03 pm |
|
Specialist |
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:05 pm Posts: 24
|
@ Jett I am the Watcher I'm always Watching and I see all I know who's been naughty or nyce and when you get Coal for Christmas you can bet I told Santa on you Also don't believe LC he will never Retire He Loves BD too much @ LC come back to F3 man WWs getting owned w/o you bro Ps. Jett isn't Maul of super sith Speed back ? (LUBU) and the fact that they deleted only proves the Plan is real Y leave the evidence behind? Q's Ban btw was for account sharing with none other than Staffy but Hey don't take my word for it ask Admin if you really wanna Know
|
|
Top |
|
CodeoftheSith
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:44 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:06 pm Posts: 670
|
1. if he got banned for account sharing with staffy, why isn't staffy banned? i'm not complaining (trust me it would have ended half a dozen problems earlier this era) but it just wouldn't make sense.
2. I haven't seen Kerss since he said he was quitting.
3. good, those guys need to learn how to play without a million subs.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
andrew852456
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:48 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:52 am Posts: 7
|
CodeoftheSith wrote: @Lost Seriously? who r u? @Andrew: Just warning you now, double posting is against forum rules, so just go back and edit your previous posts when you want to change something. IM SOWE
|
|
Top |
|
CodeoftheSith
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:55 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:06 pm Posts: 670
|
don't be, i'm just warning you so no one tries to ban you later on.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
CedricScott
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:05 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:31 am Posts: 24
|
The Q was linked to 3 other accounts in this era, none of which are currently in TLA
|
|
Top |
|
Langy
|
Post subject: Re: TLA v TAr Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:07 pm |
|
First Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:02 am Posts: 536 Gender: male
|
lost101 wrote: LoL Prince Ash where were your units in tht BR man only 98? You styll have a few members with power including yourself so why giving up already? Neway it was defiantly a nyce BR and you guys put up a hell of a fight I wonder will Dsny be Brave enough to keep all your Relics? or will they give them up to TLA? ( I think they'll give them up since they're really a TLA sub ) Remeber this for next time Bro: "When things are good everyone wants to be your friend but when the chips are down is when you find out who your "real" friends are" Price Ash decide to let his team die instead of fighting like a true warrior. he sent his crappy 98 units while his other 300 died trying to retake a relic and run lol.. such a noob and no good for any clan in the future.
_________________ (ROTF) (DETH) (MES) (AUA) (TLA) (NO) (REN) (CoV)
PROUD DETH/TLA MEMBER
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|