It is currently Sat Nov 09, 2024 11:35 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:31 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:46 am
Posts: 67
Simple topic.

Right now BL are trying to obtain a MILF relic so that they can try a sneak mission of attacking the SA relics......

BL and MILF are meant to have a nap..... SA and BL and meant to have a nap.

BL have now rolled about 1000 units into south america and are currently eta 6 ticks from a MILF relic......

AcO u lot out there???? What is ur stance with BL.... Will you defend their poor choices?


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:54 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:41 pm
Posts: 68
LoL the fact that you debate this is silly.

SA leader Wardog has made many hostile actions toward us, and very greedy. He tried claiming all of AA and all of Africa. We gave him most of AA to show respect but asking for Africa is mere greed. He also has been moving his alliances armies north through Africa and made 12 training bases near the middle east. He is clearly planning to attack us.

_________________
- SiGmund/Kaiser/SiNister
AVA, NoS, 39th, AcO, BL, H1N1, NERF, MAD, TJGA, SiN, CME

CME family


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:45 pm 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 15
Gender: male
lol ^^^^^^


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:34 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 449
Gender: male
So people know the plan was agreed apon by both me and MILF. However it seems MILF was playing me and my trust in them simply as a chance to kill some of our units.

SA have been threatning us all era and were sick of it. I had friends in MILF(being a former member) and thought that our past friendship would extend to this era. I set up a peace betweem BL and MILF and was in the process of working out peace with MILF and AcO.

But hey, with people like Asarum it should be expected.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD

Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 12:47 am 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 4:39 am
Posts: 28
i use to play e4, was in BoS , AVA family. and was GoW or Ray leader, using my wisdom, they are planning on attacking


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:29 pm 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:57 pm
Posts: 16
Gender: female
Can SA be trusted.

WARDOG read my message if you continue attacks on the coalition and moving east you will be the one to blame!

We know what you are doing and we also are not going to stand by why you do it.

Ignoring my messages only tell me that you want to be the blame.

_________________
RedDawn


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:34 pm 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:57 pm
Posts: 16
Gender: female
Guess the coalition NAP doesn't mean anything to you?

_________________
RedDawn


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:11 am 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:52 pm
Posts: 20
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Gender: male
TBF clearly launched an attack against SA. SA is defending. there are printscreens to prove that to anyone that has doubts

dont use cheap excuses if you are a liar.

just share with your allies your plan: use your smaller allies as meatshield for your own units and then enter the battlefield pretending to be saving someone

Be an honest person if you have the courage and the pride to do so. and kick out TBF since they broke our agreement and obviously the agreement with you.

Or just admit you are cheap...


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:13 am 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:52 pm
Posts: 20
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Gender: male
And to be clear, did i mention that SA IS DEFENDING and is still under attack??


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Can BL be trusted.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:30 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:46 am
Posts: 67
Hi. Im Matty of WARDOG.

I received a message from BL leader bacon boy at tick 1218. Let me remind you that we have a nap till tick 1700 the same with AcO and the rules of that nap are......

No BL ops in AA past a specific point. No AcO or subs ops in AA past a specific point and the same for SA no ops in AA past this specific point. This has been fine all alliances have kept to this part of the agreement.

No attacking of AcO subs. Hard to keep track but we have done our best.

No attacing of BL AcO or SA ops any where else in the world. So far this has also been kept to.

SA can not enter Aus. This is where the BL and AcO hive used to be and would have covered them. Since BL moved they failed to rearrange any boundaries and now feel threatened because SA have expanded a little.

Those were the rules......... that's it. Simple eh?

Now, about tick 800 i made some requests that BL and AcO reduce ops in africa... Maybe i did demand it.... but either way my demands were not met.... Which is understandable.

Now we are war with TBF, who may i remind you attacked us first "cus they are bored"

We are taking there ops and have slowed down advancing north and east through asia and russia. In fact i gave the order to my alliance 2 days ago to slow down a little.

Then i get this message from BL leader at tick 1218

Message from bacon boy the BL leader

"Yea... you're gonna need to go ahead an pick up and exit Asia or we will begin moving into AA and setting up right next to your hive too. These sorts of demands should look familiar: either start downgrading and giving up all ops in Asia, or we will have no choice but to take them ourselves. Sorry, pal... we 'voted on it.' You keep making grand "border demands" in this era and yet seem to suddebly believe your group is entitled to build up right next to our hive? Should we accept this as a signal that the border claims have come to an end? If so, we like the cold. As I keep telling you, we are happy to tangle. Your MILF masters seem to have had enough. We will very soon begin to take all SA ops in Asia. Should we encounter any resistance - ANY - we will start moving into AA as well. Im happy with either path you pick. One path keeps the peace the other gives us AA. Your call."

Now to me that screams immature.

Lets not make silly demands bacon boy we both know they dont work.

if you want a sensible adult chat about the position of our alliances speak to me in game because your blocked on skype or speak to my MoW Buhuhu

We are Napped till tick 1700. If you want to break that NAP because we are attacking a hostile alliance well over 72 ticks from your hive. Well i guess that speaks wonders for you and your alliance. Im afraid when you agree something early in the round it is unethical for you to "change" the rules of engagement because we are being more efficient than you.

Lets sort this like men not like pigs eh bacon boy?

Matty of WARDOG


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl