Author |
Message |
francois1996
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 10:45 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:43 am Posts: 81 Location: Lebanon Gender: male
|
There was only one problem in e6 for being lame, its bcz of VND. VND includes some of the best leaders (murija, rania, morgan), best players in bd (syrinx, odin, deadman,...) plus they are all active and have lots of players helping them if only murija was leading HINI for win rania was leading her team for win and morgan leading his team for win just like e1 era 9 that my friends i would call a "championship era"
_________________ Played in: aRaB,AL,AOD,HIGH,NewB,ReV,nWo,FMJ,HINI,NASA,RoL
|
|
Top |
|
Milanos
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:00 am |
|
Lieutenant Major |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm Posts: 2047
|
francois1996 wrote: There was only one problem in e6 for being lame, its bcz of VND. VND includes some of the best leaders (murija, rania, morgan), best players in bd (syrinx, odin, deadman,...) plus they are all active and have lots of players helping them if only murija was leading HINI for win rania was leading her team for win and morgan leading his team for win just like e1 era 9 that my friends i would call a "championship era" I totally disagree. If we weren't there you would have GML with an empire and SAGE with an empire.
_________________ Won both Championship Eras as rank 1.. Waiting to make it 3 out of 3.
|
|
Top |
|
francois1996
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:27 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:43 am Posts: 81 Location: Lebanon Gender: male
|
and your telling HINI isnt an empire? or KoH isnt an empire? or RUN isnt an empire? you must be kidding
_________________ Played in: aRaB,AL,AOD,HIGH,NewB,ReV,nWo,FMJ,HINI,NASA,RoL
|
|
Top |
|
trajic1
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:31 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:17 am Posts: 92
|
francois1996 wrote: and your telling HINI isnt an empire? or KoH isnt an empire? or RUN isnt an empire? you must be kidding true.
_________________ trajic/Crazy Rider
|
|
Top |
|
generated-305b0c6e18f5176-1522328841
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:16 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:07 am Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
francois1996 wrote: There was only one problem in e6 for being lame, its bcz of VND. VND includes some of the best leaders (murija, rania, morgan), best players in bd (syrinx, odin, deadman,...) plus they are all active and have lots of players helping them if only murija was leading HINI for win rania was leading her team for win and morgan leading his team for win just like e1 era 9 that my friends i would call a "championship era" I don't think you can blame VND for this, everyone who wanted to win CE got a lot of allies (excluding cbop) and so did VND they were just better so they are winning simple... and i dont see any harm in the best players coming together to win an era
|
|
Top |
|
bleaky
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:51 pm |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:46 pm Posts: 77
|
Varidhish wrote: francois1996 wrote: There was only one problem in e6 for being lame, its bcz of VND. VND includes some of the best leaders (murija, rania, morgan), best players in bd (syrinx, odin, deadman,...) plus they are all active and have lots of players helping them if only murija was leading HINI for win rania was leading her team for win and morgan leading his team for win just like e1 era 9 that my friends i would call a "championship era" I don't think you can blame VND for this, everyone who wanted to win CE got a lot of allies (excluding cbop) and so did VND they were just better so they are winning simple... and i dont see any harm in the best players coming together to win an era What do we need a champions' era for if the most active players around simply team up in one empire? Whether there is harm or not, it is LAME and that's what this thread is about.
_________________ Nicknames: s0rcy, Vidar
I am a SoLDier
|
|
Top |
|
Milanos
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 4:02 pm |
|
Lieutenant Major |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm Posts: 2047
|
francois1996 wrote: and your telling HINI isnt an empire? or KoH isnt an empire? or RUN isnt an empire? you must be kidding That is my point.. The empires run the worlds nowadays. So you can blame VND, but it is simply the way to win given the current mechanics of the game. Quote: What do we need a champions' era for if the most active players around simply team up in one empire? Whether there is harm or not, it is LAME and that's what this thread is about. This however is not true. If we had all the active players we wouldn't really have needed to fight wars. I'd say CBop is about as active as VND most of the time, many in GML were also extremely active during the war. Many in SAGE's empire were also active.. So no, I don't agree. Besides, Battledawn isn't only about activity
_________________ Won both Championship Eras as rank 1.. Waiting to make it 3 out of 3.
|
|
Top |
|
bleaky
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:48 pm |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:46 pm Posts: 77
|
We all know that fighting wars on an era like this requires extreme activity. Not too many players around can (and want to) actually bring it. If VND absorbs so many of those in their teams, obviously there will be less alliances who are able to compete. I think that's what francois was talking about. If we didnt have one super-coalition here, it would surely be a less one-sided era and probably a more interesting one. Or we would need another guy like daemon to form another super-coalition
_________________ Nicknames: s0rcy, Vidar
I am a SoLDier
|
|
Top |
|
redwurm
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:32 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 799 Location: Ohio Gender: male
|
I think the lack of more teams is the only real downfall here. I'm partially to blame in that fact since I did not put together my own team (I did try though).
_________________ mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote: There is no clue boost. bfan8475 wrote: If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight
|
|
Top |
|
generated-305b0c6e18f5176-1522328841
|
Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era? Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 1:05 am |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:07 am Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
bleaky wrote: We all know that fighting wars on an era like this requires extreme activity. Not too many players around can (and want to) actually bring it. If VND absorbs so many of those in their teams, obviously there will be less alliances who are able to compete. I think that's what francois was talking about. If we didnt have one super-coalition here, it would surely be a less one-sided era and probably a more interesting one. Or we would need another guy like daemon to form another super-coalition lol :p well SoLD can still make things interesting
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|