Well, that and a ton of resource ops ;D

-Pete

http://prntscr.com/18vbuc like this.

Aw thanks greeny! Greeny has graciously shown us what the 5th place alliance would look like

Heres what a number 1 alliance looks like


-Pete

gotta disagree, activity is not the only way to succeed in BD. An awesome team who u can coordinate well, understand and play to support ur weakness is another factors to win the game.

also communication, all the coordination with members as well as other alliances.

Well now you are just arguing for the sake of arguing.

Good luck coordinating with people who don't log on. Activity is BY FAR the most important thing. Good alliances stem coordination and communication from activity of their members but without active players, you cannot win. Well unless you are playing F4

And what kind of "Awesome team" isn't active

-Pete

I could agree with Aister by saying that it really only requires 1 active member on a team if they are able to get a hold of the other members. For example I am always more active than most players even when I consider my activity sub par since I am that way I can call, text, whatsapp, or skype my other members to get on when I need them for a big attack or to defend. It really does only take 1 extremely active and many alliances have proven that.

Id much rather have 10

And logging on when people call you is what I would consider active. Inactive players are the ones who ignore phone calls. In my opinion at least

-Pete

wow pete, you know nothing about SoLD, yes i am a SoLD member but i remember we used strategy and our activity better than just boosting and hoping it will help us, we pulled through wars that we wouldn't of if there was no team work, or strategy, i want to say thank you to leaders such as edi, uni and xeeron who led SoLD in eras on e2 and e3

That's funny .

Getting alot of Conqurers...
Workers and Armour units at the end of era will help you rank up fast